Gravitational lensing statistics with extragalactic surveys. III. Joint constraints on $\lambda_{0}$ and $\Omega_{0}$ from lensing statistics and the $m$-$z$ relation for type Ia supernovae

Phillip Helbig

A&A, 350, 1, 1–8 (October (I) 1999)

I present constraints on cosmological parameters in the $\lambda_{0}$-$\Omega_{0}$ plane from a joint analysis of lensing statistics \citep{PHelbigMQWBK99a} and the magnitude-redshift relation for Type~Ia~supernovae \citep{SPerlmutteretal99a,ARiessetal98a}. I discuss reasons why this particular combination of tests is important and how the constraints can be improved in the future. The lensing statistics and supernova results are not inconsistent, thus it is meaningful to determine joint constraints on $\lambda_{0}$ and $\Omega_{0}$ by combining the results from both tests. The quantity measured by the lens statistics and the $m$-$z$ relation for type Ia supernovae discussed here is approximately $\lambda_{0}-\Omega_{0}$. At 95\% confidence, the upper limit on $\lambda_{0}-\Omega_{0}$ from lensing statistics alone is 0.45 and from supernovae alone is in the range 0.65--0.81 (depending on the data set). For joint constraints, the upper limit on $\lambda_{0}-\Omega_{0}$ is in the range 0.55--0.60 (again depending on the data set). For a flat universe with $\lambda_{0} + \Omega_{0} = 1$, this corresponds to upper limits on $\lambda_{0}$, taking the top of the range from different data sets, of 0.72, 0.90 and 0.80 for lensing statistics alone, supernovae alone and the joint analysis, respectively. This is perfectly consistent with the current `standard cosmological model' with $\lambda_{0}\approx 0.7$ and $\Omega_{0}\approx 0.3$ and is consistent with a flat universe but, neglecting other cosmological tests, does not require it.

info and local links to full paper | ADS: 1999A&A...350....1H | arXiv: astro-ph/9904311 | Google Scholar
directory of Phillip Helbig's abstracts
Phillip Helbig's publications
Phillip Helbig's research
Phillip Helbig's home page
last modified on Tuesday, December 31, 2013 at 11:07:06 PM by (remove animal to reply)